<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Camera Reviews &#187; Nikon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenllama.net/camera/category/nikon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenllama.net/camera</link>
	<description>Digital Photography Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 18:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Digital Camera Reviews : Nikon Coolpix P1</title>
		<link>http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/10/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-p1/</link>
		<comments>http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/10/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-p1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/10/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-p1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Steve&#8217;s Digicams reviews the Nikon Coolpix P1 and writes &#8211; &#8216;The 8-megapixel Coolpix P1 and 5-megapixel P2 are the world’s first builtin Wi-Fi-enabled (802.11b/g-compatible) digital cameras and allow consumers to immediately transmit images wirelessly directly to a computer or to any PictBridge-enabled printer equipped with the optional Nikon Wireless Printer Adapter (PD-10), for wireless printing.&#8217;
CNET [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5573/1877/1600/nikon_coolpix_p1.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5573/1877/320/nikon_coolpix_p1.jpg" /></a><br />
Steve&#8217;s Digicams reviews the <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/p1.html">Nikon Coolpix P1</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;The 8-megapixel Coolpix P1 and 5-megapixel P2 are the world’s first builtin Wi-Fi-enabled (802.11b/g-compatible) digital cameras and allow consumers to immediately transmit images wirelessly directly to a computer or to any PictBridge-enabled printer equipped with the optional Nikon Wireless Printer Adapter (PD-10), for wireless printing.&#8217;</p>
<p>CNET reviews the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/Nikon_Coolpix_P1/4505-6501_7-31511364.html">Nikon Coolpix P1</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;The Nikon Coolpix P1&#8217;s most noticeable flaw is its somewhat sluggish performance. Slower than many cameras in its class, it takes more than 5 seconds to grab its first shot after powering up, and it has a poor continuous-shooting rate of 0.7 to 1.4 frames per second&#8217;</p>
<p>Nikon Imaging has a great spec sheet available on the <a href="http://nikonimaging.com/global/products/digitalcamera/coolpix/p1/">Nikon Coolpix P1</a>.</p>
<p>With 8 megapixels on tap, as well as this newfangled wi-fi thing, the Nikon Coolpix P1 has got some potential.  The reviews are mixed though, based on sub-par speed, and limited wi-fi use.  I&#8217;m all for anything that helps clean up my desk &#8211; I have wires everywhere!</p>
<div>Tags:</p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/DigitalCameraPlace/DigitalCameraPlace+nikon">nikon</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/10/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-p1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Camera Reviews : Nikon Coolpix S4 Review at Steve&#8217;s Digicams</title>
		<link>http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/07/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-s4-review-at-steves-digicams/</link>
		<comments>http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/07/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-s4-review-at-steves-digicams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/07/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-s4-review-at-steves-digicams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Steve&#8217;s Digicams reviews the Nikon Coolpix S4 and writes &#8211; &#8216;The Nikon Coolpix S4 is somewhat of a mixed bag. While we love the big 10x optical zoom lens, swiveling body design and its various user-friendly exposure modes; its average image quality, terrible movie mode, and slow flash recycle time really hinders its ability to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5573/1877/1600/nikon_coolpix_s4.jpg"><img border="0" alt="Nikon Coolpix S4" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5573/1877/320/nikon_coolpix_s4.jpg" /></a><br />
Steve&#8217;s Digicams reviews the <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/s4.html">Nikon Coolpix S4</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;The Nikon Coolpix S4 is somewhat of a mixed bag. While we love the big 10x optical zoom lens, swiveling body design and its various user-friendly exposure modes; its average image quality, terrible movie mode, and slow flash recycle time really hinders its ability to &#8220;be all it can be&#8221;.&#8217;</p>
<p>Digital Photography Review also reviews the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0509/05090103nikon_coolpixs4.asp">Nikon Coolpix S4</a> and they write &#8211; &#8216;Not only is the lens of the COOLPIX S4 incredibly powerful, but it is also housed within a unique swiveling body that allows the lens to be directed independently of the LCD monitor. As a result, it provides new potential for taking pictures from a more imaginative range of angles — shooting from the hip, shooting from overhead, and allowing the photographer to point the lens and the LCD monitor in the same direction simultaneously to achieve self-portraits with more accurate composition.&#8217;</p>
<p>PC Magazine reviews the <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1900751,00.asp">Nikon Coolpix S4</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;It&#8217;s a wonderful design, especially useful for Hail Mary shots or shooting over crowds. Unfortunately, we found the pictures taken with the S4 to be a bit disappointing.&#8217;</p>
<p>Overall it sounds like a great design by Nikon is overshadowed by subpar image quality.  In each review, you&#8217;ll hear praises being sung for the design &#8211; and it is a unique design, no question.  However, at some point functionality has to take precendence over style.  A digital camera should take great pictures first, and be pretty second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenllama.net/camera/2006/01/07/digital-camera-reviews-nikon-coolpix-s4-review-at-steves-digicams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
