<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smartphone Reviews &#187; Motorola</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/category/motorola/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone</link>
	<description>Treo, Smartphone, and Pocket PC Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Motorola Q Update with Push Email</title>
		<link>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-update-with-push-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-update-with-push-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>greenllama.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-update-with-push-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Motorola just released a big update for Verizon&#8217;s Motorola Q. The biggest reason for the change?  Push email of course, Microsoft style.  There are a few other improvements, including DUN and frames support for the web browser.  If you have a Q, I suggest getting the update as soon as possible, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="imagelink" title="motorola-q.jpg" href="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/motorola-q.jpg"><img id="image215" alt="motorola-q.jpg" src="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/motorola-q.thumbnail.jpg" /></a> Motorola just released a big update for Verizon&#8217;s Motorola Q. The biggest reason for the change?  Push email of course, Microsoft style.  There are a few other improvements, including DUN and frames support for the web browser.  If you have a Q, I suggest getting the update as soon as possible, to ensure you stay current.  You can download the update from <a href="http://direct.motorola.com/hellomoto/motosupport/source/softwareupdate.asp">Motorola</a>.</p>
<p>Read more about the <a href="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-review/">Motorola Q</a>.</p>
<p><span id="intelliTxt" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-update-with-push-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola Q Review Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-review-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-review-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leroy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, there sure have been a number of Motorola Q reviews popping up since I last updated.  I&#8217;m going to try to get them all here, so I can keep everyone posted.  If I missed one, please let me know in the comments.  Here goes:

Infosync reviews the Motorola Q and writes &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/images/2006/06/motorola-q.jpg"><img alt="motorola q" src="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/images/2006/06/motorola-q-thumb.jpg" width="128" height="187" /></a>Wow, there sure have been a number of Motorola Q reviews popping up since I last updated.  I&#8217;m going to try to get them all here, so I can keep everyone posted.  If I missed one, please let me know in the comments.  Here goes:<br />
<strong><br />
Infosync</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/n/6810.html">Motorola Q</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;While the Motorola Q packs in some impressive features into its svelte, half-inch frame, including top-notch messaging abilities, EV-DO support, Bluetooth and a surprisingly good 1.3-megapixel camera, we can&#8217;t overlook the phone&#8217;s disappointingly lethargic performance or its underpowered office features. &#8216;</p>
<p>Not impressed.</p>
<p><strong>Sci-Tech Today</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.sci-tech-today.com/story.xhtml?story_id=03100000T3OO">Motorola Q</a> and has this to say &#8211; &#8216;The Moto Q does not ship with Wi-Fi onboard, but if you&#8217;re roaming in one of Verizon&#8217;s EVDO coverage areas, you will receive data at speeds of 400 to 700 Kbps, on average, which in many instances will obviate the need for Wi-Fi. Although the handset offers support for external keyboards and mice, it cannot currently function as an EVDO modem for laptops. A software solution for this is in the works, however.&#8217;</p>
<p>External keyboard and mouse?  Cool.  </p>
<p><strong>Mobility Site</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2006/06/motorola_q_review_1.php">Motorola Q</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;The “Q” and Motorola deliver exactly what they promised.  This was suppose to be a Treo killer and it may be just that.  Smaller lighter smarter, and a better phone and camera. With the unit being so new things can only get better, I am sure that additional programs and ad-ins will keep this unit expanding and growing.  In many ways it is revolutionary.&#8217;<br />
<span id="more-171"></span><br />
<strong>MobileBurn</strong> also reviews the <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/review.jsp?Id=2398">Motorola Q</a> and has this to say &#8211; &#8216;I adore the Motorola Q, even with its somewhat limited battery life and few random blemishes. In fact, this is the first non-camera oriented device that I have wanted to use as my day to day phone in a very, very long time. It is that good. With a bit more polish and a few updates to the OS (in addition to that heavy duty battery), this device will be truly fantastic.<br />
The Motorola Q has a lot of competitors out there that are equally capable, like the Palm Treo 700p and 700w, and the 8700 series of RIM BlackBerry devices, to name but a few, but I think that the Q&#8217;s RAZR inspired good looks and relatively low purchase price ($199 with 2yr EV-DO agreement on Verizon) will make it a very hot seller that is going to put a lot of pressure on the other players. It may not be as big for Moto as the RAZR series, but I think this one is going to make them proud. I give it a &#8220;Highly Recommended&#8221; rating.&#8217;</p>
<p><strong>PC Mag</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1967190,00.asp">Motorola Q</a> and says &#8211; &#8216;The Q&#8217;s major competitors are from Palm—the Treo 700w and the newer Treo 700p. The 700w is more expensive than the Q and has little to recommend it. The 700p comes with Microsoft Office document editors (not just viewers), has a higher-res screen, runs on both Verizon and Sprint, and is both faster and less buggy than the Q. On the other hand, it costs $200 more and is considerably chubbier. So while the 700p retains the Editors&#8217; Choice crown, the Q is an excellent machine and a terrific choice.&#8217;</p>
<p>Read more about the <a href="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/2006/06/motorola_q_review.html">Motorola Q</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-review-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola Q Review</title>
		<link>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leroy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The most striking thing about the Motorola Q is the thickness &#8211; or lack of thickness more specifically.  Another entry in the growing &#8220;blackberry style&#8221; or &#8220;Treo style&#8221; crowd, the Motorola Q stands out because it is, by far, the thinnest among them.  The Q runs Windows Mobile 5 for Smartphones &#8211; which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="imagelink" title="motorola-q.jpg" href="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/motorola-q.jpg"><img id="image215" alt="motorola-q.jpg" src="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/motorola-q.thumbnail.jpg" /></a><br />
The most striking thing about the Motorola Q is the thickness &#8211; or lack of thickness more specifically.  Another entry in the growing &#8220;blackberry style&#8221; or &#8220;Treo style&#8221; crowd, the Motorola Q stands out because it is, by far, the thinnest among them.  The Q runs Windows Mobile 5 for Smartphones &#8211; which  means no touchscreen.  This has to be the most curious thing about this device.  Opting for the alternate version of Windows Mobile 5 and including a touchscreen would have eased many users concerns, and added a whole new world of capability to this device.  Can the sexy form factor overcome the downfalls?  Read on to find out.</p>
<h4>Motorola Q Specs</h4>
<p>Radio: CDMA / EV-DO<br />
Display: 320&#215;240 pixels<br />
Full QWERTY keyboard<br />
Memory: 128MB ROM / 64MB RAM<br />
MiniSD card slot<br />
Bluetooth 1.2<br />
1.3 Megapixel Camera</p>
<h4>Motorola Q Reviews</h4>
<p><strong>Cnet</strong> reviews the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/Motorola_Q/4505-6452_7-31473357.html">Motorola Q </a>and writes &#8211; &#8216;Web browsing on the Motorola Q was fairly smooth and painless, thanks to the EV-DO support. Graphics-intensive sites such as CNET.com took a bit longer to upload, but it was definitely quicker than with non-3G mobiles. What really blew us away, however, was the multimedia experience. We transferred several videos to the device, including a music video and an episode of Family Guy, and we had a blast watching them on the Q. The sharpness of the video on the Q was amazing, especially compared to the Treo 700p, with which we couldn&#8217;t even get through a whole video because the picture was so blurry. Also, listening to music was top-notch, thanks to the dual stereo-quality speakers.&#8217;<br />
<strong><br />
PC Magazine</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1967190,00.asp">Motorola Q</a> and has this to say &#8211; &#8216;The Q&#8217;s major competitors are from Palm—the Treo 700w and the newer Treo 700p. The 700w is more expensive than the Q and has little to recommend it. The 700p comes with Microsoft Office document editors (not just viewers), has a higher-res screen, runs on both Verizon and Sprint, and is both faster and less buggy than the Q. On the other hand, it costs $200 more and is considerably chubbier. So while the 700p retains the Editors&#8217; Choice crown, the Q is an excellent machine and a terrific choice.&#8217;</p>
<p>In their eyes, the choice between the Motorola Q and the Palm Treo 700p comes down to a cost / feature comparison.  While slimmer and less expensive, the Q is definately less capable than the Treo 700p.  Which one will win the crown of most popular smartphone?</p>
<p><strong>The Boston Herald</strong> reviews the <a href="http://business.bostonherald.com/technologyNews/view.bg?articleid=141737">Motorola Q</a> and does not believe it to be a Blackberry killer &#8211; &#8216;There are ways to get instant e-mail on the Q, but they’re slightly clunky. If your company has a server running Good Technology Inc.’s GoodLink software or Verizon’s Wireless Sync program, you can set the Q up to get push e-mail from one of those servers. That’s similar to the BlackBerry model of distributing e-mail.&#8217;<br />
&#8216;Motorola has high hopes for the Q, expecting it to sell as well as the Razr, the superslim clamshell phone. That seems optimistic. If you’re going to pay $110 a month for portable e-mail, there are better ways, unless slim and light are your main criteria. &#8216;</p>
<p><strong>Phone Scoop</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/review_moto_q/index.php?p=f1">Motorola Q</a>  and writes &#8211; &#8216;Most people looking to buy the Q probably won&#8217;t to type many long emails or hundreds of text messages a week. And for the casual keyboard, the Q offers a solid smartphone experience in an attractive and easily pocketable form.<br />
For heavy texters and email warriors, the Q isn&#8217;t quite the slam dunk that it is for others. You&#8217;ll have to evaluate whether the slim form factor and other positive attributes will outweigh your typing slowed down by frequent trips to the delete key to correct mistakes.&#8217;<br />
<span id="more-154"></span><br />
Infosync reviews the <a href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/n/6810.html">Motorola Q</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;While the Motorola Q packs in some impressive features into its svelte, half-inch frame, including top-notch messaging abilities, EV-DO support, Bluetooth and a surprisingly good 1.3-megapixel camera, we can&#8217;t overlook the phone&#8217;s disappointingly lethargic performance or its underpowered office features. &#8216;</p>
<p>Not impressed.</p>
<p><strong>Sci-Tech Today</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.sci-tech-today.com/story.xhtml?story_id=03100000T3OO">Motorola Q</a> and has this to say &#8211; &#8216;The Moto Q does not ship with Wi-Fi onboard, but if you&#8217;re roaming in one of Verizon&#8217;s EVDO coverage areas, you will receive data at speeds of 400 to 700 Kbps, on average, which in many instances will obviate the need for Wi-Fi. Although the handset offers support for external keyboards and mice, it cannot currently function as an EVDO modem for laptops. A software solution for this is in the works, however.&#8217;</p>
<p>External keyboard and mouse?  Cool.</p>
<p><strong>Mobility Site</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2006/06/motorola_q_review_1.php">Motorola Q</a> and writes &#8211; &#8216;The “Q” and Motorola deliver exactly what they promised.  This was suppose to be a Treo killer and it may be just that.  Smaller lighter smarter, and a better phone and camera. With the unit being so new things can only get better, I am sure that additional programs and ad-ins will keep this unit expanding and growing.  In many ways it is revolutionary.&#8217;</p>
<p><strong>MobileBurn</strong> also reviews the <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/review.jsp?Id=2398">Motorola Q</a> and has this to say &#8211; &#8216;I adore the Motorola Q, even with its somewhat limited battery life and few random blemishes. In fact, this is the first non-camera oriented device that I have wanted to use as my day to day phone in a very, very long time. It is that good. With a bit more polish and a few updates to the OS (in addition to that heavy duty battery), this device will be truly fantastic.<br />
The Motorola Q has a lot of competitors out there that are equally capable, like the Palm Treo 700p and 700w, and the 8700 series of RIM BlackBerry devices, to name but a few, but I think that the Q&#8217;s RAZR inspired good looks and relatively low purchase price ($199 with 2yr EV-DO agreement on Verizon) will make it a very hot seller that is going to put a lot of pressure on the other players. It may not be as big for Moto as the RAZR series, but I think this one is going to make them proud. I give it a &#8220;Highly Recommended&#8221; rating.&#8217;</p>
<p><strong>PC Mag</strong> reviews the <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1967190,00.asp">Motorola Q</a> and says &#8211; &#8216;The Q&#8217;s major competitors are from Palm—the Treo 700w and the newer Treo 700p. The 700w is more expensive than the Q and has little to recommend it. The 700p comes with Microsoft Office document editors (not just viewers), has a higher-res screen, runs on both Verizon and Sprint, and is both faster and less buggy than the Q. On the other hand, it costs $200 more and is considerably chubbier. So while the 700p retains the Editors&#8217; Choice crown, the Q is an excellent machine and a terrific choice.&#8217;</p>
<p>ZDNet reviews the <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=3509">Motorola Q</a>  and likes it, but sees vast need for improvement just the same - &#8216;As neat as  this phone is, I was quite surprised by the fact that this was let out of the  lab with so very much room for improvement. Obvious user interface stuff (at  least to me, it&#8217;s obvious) that&#8217;s really detracts from this SCP&#8217;s potential.&#8217;</p>
<p class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/smartphone" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'smartphone'." rel="tag">smartphone</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/motorola%2Bq" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'motorola+q'." rel="tag">motorola+q</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/motorola" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'motorola'." rel="tag">motorola</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/windows%2Bmobile" title="See the Technorati tag page for 'windows+mobile'." rel="tag">windows+mobile</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/motorola-q-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smartphone Reviews : The Motorola Q Shows up at 2006 International CES</title>
		<link>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/smartphone-reviews-the-motorola-q-shows-up-at-2006-international-ces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/smartphone-reviews-the-motorola-q-shows-up-at-2006-international-ces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leroy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WindowsMobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Geekzone got a quick look at the Motorola Q Windows Mobile Smartphone at  2006 International CES and said &#8216;Enough said. Just look at these pictures &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t mind replacing my Telecom Apache for one of these new Motorola Q on CDMA&#8230;&#8217;

Mobileburn has some more info on the Motorola Q Windows Mobile Smartphone.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/images/2006/01/motorola_q.0.jpg"><img alt="Motorola Q smartphone" src="http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/images/2006/01/motorola_q.0-thumb.jpg" width="76" height="128" /></a></p>
<p>Geekzone got a quick look at the <a href="http://www.geekzone.co.nz/content.asp?contentid=5707">Motorola Q Windows Mobile Smartphone</a> at  2006 International CES and said &#8216;Enough said. Just look at these pictures &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t mind replacing my Telecom Apache for one of these new Motorola Q on CDMA&#8230;&#8217;<br />
<span id="more-31"></span><br />
Mobileburn has some more info on the <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/gallery.jsp?Page=1&amp;Id=1855">Motorola Q Windows Mobile Smartphone</a>.  They write &#8211; &#8216;I found the Q&#8217;s QWERTY keyboard to be about as good as that in the current Treo line, its extra width and spacing suiting my hands a bit better overall. The Q&#8217;s size and weight are right on target, and it slips oh so easily into a shirt or jacket pocket.&#8217;</p>
<p>It seems more &amp; more smartphones these days are coming out in the &#8220;blackberry&#8221; form factor.  I would call it the Treo form factor, but I gotta admit, RIM had it first.</p>
<p>It sounds like this one has some impressive specs, with the mini-SD slot &amp; 1.3 MP camera.  The ultra-thin design ( for a smartphone ) is interesting too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greenllama.net/smartphone/smartphone-reviews-the-motorola-q-shows-up-at-2006-international-ces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.756 seconds -->
